<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Truth Theorem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://matejnovak.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://matejnovak.com</link>
	<description>&#34;Words, words, words.&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:03:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Here&#8217;s where I came in&#8230; by Matej</title>
		<link>http://matejnovak.com/2011/10/18/heres-where-i-came-in/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matej]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matejnovak.com/?p=93#comment-86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, that&#039;s a good question, and part of the issue, really. Interested?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;s a good question, and part of the issue, really. Interested?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Here&#8217;s where I came in&#8230; by keneumey</title>
		<link>http://matejnovak.com/2011/10/18/heres-where-i-came-in/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[keneumey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matejnovak.com/?p=93#comment-85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you need volunteer writers to write?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you need volunteer writers to write?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Here&#8217;s where I came in&#8230; by davidwboswell</title>
		<link>http://matejnovak.com/2011/10/18/heres-where-i-came-in/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[davidwboswell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matejnovak.com/?p=93#comment-84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for posting.  It&#039;s very interesting to hear that you didn&#039;t think you could contribute even after being pretty familiar with the community.  I&#039;ve seen other people express similar thoughts, so it&#039;s something we should think through.

Part of the issue may be people associating Mozilla as an open source project, as you mention.  The project started out as a code-focused effort, but has grown beyond that -- so much so that I don&#039;t think &#039;open source&#039; really fits.  

I think we&#039;re much closer in many ways now to non-profits like the Red Cross that aren&#039;t in the open source space at all than we are to Linux, Apache or other open source projects.  So do we want to use &#039;open source&#039; to describe ourselves any more?

That might seem like a small semantic difference, but I think it does create a mindset for people when they think about how they might be able to get involved.  I&#039;d be interested in working together to try different ways to talk about how people can get involved to see if we can find better ways to help people understand what they could do.

And here&#039;s one brainstormed idea for how to bring volunteer writers on board: Now that the brand toolkit is out, you can ask people to audit the content spread across the 200+ Mozilla sites and track changes they suggest making to make our story clearer and more consistent.

David]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting.  It&#8217;s very interesting to hear that you didn&#8217;t think you could contribute even after being pretty familiar with the community.  I&#8217;ve seen other people express similar thoughts, so it&#8217;s something we should think through.</p>
<p>Part of the issue may be people associating Mozilla as an open source project, as you mention.  The project started out as a code-focused effort, but has grown beyond that &#8212; so much so that I don&#8217;t think &#8216;open source&#8217; really fits.  </p>
<p>I think we&#8217;re much closer in many ways now to non-profits like the Red Cross that aren&#8217;t in the open source space at all than we are to Linux, Apache or other open source projects.  So do we want to use &#8216;open source&#8217; to describe ourselves any more?</p>
<p>That might seem like a small semantic difference, but I think it does create a mindset for people when they think about how they might be able to get involved.  I&#8217;d be interested in working together to try different ways to talk about how people can get involved to see if we can find better ways to help people understand what they could do.</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s one brainstormed idea for how to bring volunteer writers on board: Now that the brand toolkit is out, you can ask people to audit the content spread across the 200+ Mozilla sites and track changes they suggest making to make our story clearer and more consistent.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On success, arrogance and toolkits&#8230; by Andrea-ITA</title>
		<link>http://matejnovak.com/2011/10/07/on-success-arrogance-and-toolkits/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrea-ITA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matejnovak.com/?p=84#comment-83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, reading the Manifesto is really making me feel proud of being part of the community!
I also like the styling very much]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, reading the Manifesto is really making me feel proud of being part of the community!<br />
I also like the styling very much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On success, arrogance and toolkits&#8230; by jmswisher</title>
		<link>http://matejnovak.com/2011/10/07/on-success-arrogance-and-toolkits/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jmswisher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 01:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matejnovak.com/?p=84#comment-76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congratulations on publishing the brand toolkit! And on being able to share your success :-)

Also, you can quit fretting about ending sentences with prepositions. It&#039;s OK, really: http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/ending-prepositions.aspx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on publishing the brand toolkit! And on being able to share your success <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Also, you can quit fretting about ending sentences with prepositions. It&#8217;s OK, really: <a href="http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/ending-prepositions.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/ending-prepositions.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Communicating Channels&#8230; by skierpage</title>
		<link>http://matejnovak.com/2011/06/30/communicating-channels/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[skierpage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 02:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matejnovak.com/?p=81#comment-63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@njn has it perfectly.

And I predict Mozilla will soon be calling it &quot;Firefox 2011.3 which is currently in the Aurora channel&quot; to sidestep all the wailing and gnashing about too many changes/no major features/not what I expected/too much churn.  They&#039;re time-based releases, give them time-based versions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@njn has it perfectly.</p>
<p>And I predict Mozilla will soon be calling it &#8220;Firefox 2011.3 which is currently in the Aurora channel&#8221; to sidestep all the wailing and gnashing about too many changes/no major features/not what I expected/too much churn.  They&#8217;re time-based releases, give them time-based versions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Communicating Channels&#8230; by Staś Małolepszy</title>
		<link>http://matejnovak.com/2011/06/30/communicating-channels/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staś Małolepszy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matejnovak.com/?p=81#comment-62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like &#039;channel&#039;, because I think it goes nicely with updating, as in an &#039;update channel.&#039; I agree it&#039;s too geeky though.

Here&#039;s some thoughts I had after giving an interview about Firefox 5 in Polish:  the Polish word for &#039;channel&#039; didn&#039;t really click, so I went for &#039;layers&#039;, to distinguish from &#039;versions.&#039;

I think layers can be understood as layers of stability, or protection.  Release channel is well protected, while nightly is almost naked.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like &#8216;channel&#8217;, because I think it goes nicely with updating, as in an &#8216;update channel.&#8217; I agree it&#8217;s too geeky though.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s some thoughts I had after giving an interview about Firefox 5 in Polish:  the Polish word for &#8216;channel&#8217; didn&#8217;t really click, so I went for &#8216;layers&#8217;, to distinguish from &#8216;versions.&#8217;</p>
<p>I think layers can be understood as layers of stability, or protection.  Release channel is well protected, while nightly is almost naked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Us and us&#8230; by Staś Małolepszy</title>
		<link>http://matejnovak.com/2011/06/22/us-and-us/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staś Małolepszy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matejnovak.com/?p=65#comment-61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of &lt;3.

Also, I really like the verb &#039;Mozilla-fy.&#039;  I think that much of the localization is in fact Mozillafying the local messaging and not localizing the &#039;official&#039; Mozilla messaging. This might seem counter-intuitive at first, but I believe that going forward this is how we will  scale, empower the community and stay relevant to the end users.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of &lt;3.</p>
<p>Also, I really like the verb &#039;Mozilla-fy.&#039;  I think that much of the localization is in fact Mozillafying the local messaging and not localizing the &#039;official&#039; Mozilla messaging. This might seem counter-intuitive at first, but I believe that going forward this is how we will  scale, empower the community and stay relevant to the end users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Communicating Channels&#8230; by Teoli</title>
		<link>http://matejnovak.com/2011/06/30/communicating-channels/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Teoli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matejnovak.com/?p=81#comment-60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I often use &quot;phase&quot; when I&#039;m communicating about upcoming features of Firefox (Feature X will very likely be Firefox 7, currently in the Nightly phase).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often use &#8220;phase&#8221; when I&#8217;m communicating about upcoming features of Firefox (Feature X will very likely be Firefox 7, currently in the Nightly phase).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Communicating Channels&#8230; by Anthony Ricaud</title>
		<link>http://matejnovak.com/2011/06/30/communicating-channels/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Ricaud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 03:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matejnovak.com/?p=81#comment-59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about flavours ? It is always Firefox but with different tastes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about flavours ? It is always Firefox but with different tastes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

